|
|
Bring Africans to the US and the EU as Healthcare Workers! |
|
|
Many policy ideas on immigration in the US and Europe deal with containing and controlling immigration. One extreme example is the recent talk in the US about building a wall on the border with Mexico, a suggestion that has provoked fierce debate and deep anger.
But immigration, legal and clandestine, is not going away. Rather than hide behind walls and nationalism, Europe and America should transform immigration: by making it even more beneficial for our societies than it already is, and by using the flow of ideas and skills that is promoted by immigration to address global issues such as healthcare.
The proposal outlined below attempts to address three major problems - immigration, African poverty and underdevelopment, and a global shortage of healthcare workers - by treating them as inter-related. But first, let's briefly review some facts and trends.
THE FACTS: IMMIGRATION, AFRICAN POVERTY, AND THE GLOBAL HEALTHCARE WORKERS SHORTAGE
The problems posed by immigration in both the United States and the European Union are well-known. To cite just a few examples, France has deep rooted tensions between sections of the white, "native French" community and immigrants from North and sub-Saharan Africa; such tensions were visible as recently as the current presidential campaigns. Immigration into Britain hit an all-time high last year, provoking serious debates about how to handle illegal immigrants and integrate newcomers, especially in a context where the fear of terrorism runs high. Meanwhile, many young African men are so determined to reach European shores that they set off for Spain's Canary Islands by boat. Such desperation has sparked concern among European leaders, who in 2005 pledged to greatly increase their aid to Africa.
Africa's economic and social crises are equally well-known. Three decades of instability, economic decline, and stagnation has led some pessimists to begin laying the blame for Africa's problems at Africa's feet. While blaming Africa goes too far, many experts and much of the Western public would agree that foreign aid money has achieved mixed results in Africa. America and Europe face the tough challenge of how to use aid money not as a band-aid, but as a serious investment in long-term development.
Meanwhile, according to the World Health Organization, humanity faces a global shortage of healthcare workers. The consequences of this shortage will be severe:
Fifty-seven countries, most of them in Africa and Asia, face a severe health workforce crisis. WHO estimates that at least 2 360 000 health service providers and 1 890 000 management support workers, or a total of 4 250 000 health workers, are needed to fill the gap. Without prompt action, the shortage will worsen.
Health workers are inequitably distributed throughout the world, with severe imbalances between developed and developing countries. This global workforce shortage is made even worse by imbalances within countries. In general, there is a lack of adequate staff in rural areas compared to cities.
Sub-Saharan Africa faces the greatest challenges. While it has 11 percent of the world's population and 24 percent of the global burden of disease, it has only 3 percent of the world's health workers.
There is a direct relationship between the ratio of health workers to population and survival of women during childbirth and children in early infancy. As the number of health workers declines, survival declines proportionately.
The WHO lists a number of strategies for solving the crisis. Tellingly, the first is "more direct investment in the training and support of health workers."
A separate WHO report addresses the widespread phenomenon of healthcare workers from developing countries who migrate to developed nations in search of better economic opportunities and working conditions. This trend brings some benefits to the home countries, mainly in the form of income workers send back to family and friends from abroad. But in the long run, each doctor or nurse who leaves represents a financial loss as the investment a country has made in a professional's education is lost to another country. Even more serious is the impact on the healthcare industry as a whole in developing countries:
When a country has a fragile health system, the loss of its workforce can bring the whole system close to collapse, with the consequences measured in lives lost.
The proposal does not necessarily aim to halt the migration of health workers. Rather, it aims to control and promote it, turning a loss into a gain by giving experienced professionals incentives to use their skills in their home countries.
The United States has not been untouched by the global shortage of nurses, doctors, technicians, and other specialists. By 2002, "inadequate nurse staffing has been a factor in 24 percent of the 1,609 cases involving patient death, injury or permanent loss of function reported since 1997″ and "90 percent of long-term care facilities don't have enough nurses to provide even the most basic care." According to numbers given by the American Association of Colleges of Nursing, the current shortage may grow to 340,000 unfilled positions by 2020. Reports in the last few years suggest that Canada faces similar problems. The shortage is not as acute in Europe. But if low European birth rates continue, Europe will likely face a healthcare crisis of its own.
While the problems outlined here are grave, they also represent an opportunity. Each side has needs, and each side has assets. The proposal that follows attempts to show how African immigration into the West, if properly transformed and guided, could bring massive benefits to America, Europe, and Africa.
THE PROPOSAL
I propose that the European Union and the United States begin training young Africans to work on a temporary basis as healthcare workers in the EU and the US.
Such a program would entail recruiting promising young Africans from universities all across the continent, paying for two years of intensive training to become nurses, x-ray technicians, or one of any of a number of other specialties. Additional training would be given, if necessary, in a European language selected by the participant, thereby completing their preparation to work in a hospital or other healthcare facility in the developed world.
After a stay of at minimum 5 and at maximum 10 years, graduates of the program would be sent back to Africa with the intent that, once back in their home countries, they would contribute their skills and experience to the development of the healthcare sector there. Graduates could also act as mentors for future generations of African healthcare professionals. A strong alumni network and outreach effort would keep graduates connected with each other and with peers in Europe and America.
After fine-tuning the specifics of such a policy by experimenting with several pilot programs, a broad-based effort to recruit Africans for work in the healthcare sector could be put in place.
RECAP
The program would help solve the following problems:
1. An increasingly problematic shortage of nurses and healthcare technicians in Europe and America.
Highly trained healthcare workers from Africa could provide a much needed influx of skilled workers in a vital economic and social sector.
2. Economic and social repercussions as the baby boomer generation in America begins to approach retirement age and birthrates in Europe decline.
In societies where demographic trends threaten to skew the age balance of developed nations, opening the doors to a large number of skilled immigrants who will be able to help care for the elderly in these countries would help to maintain economic vigor and demographic balance.
3. The need for a more organized and productive framework for absorbing Africans who wish to immigrate to the Europe and the US. As an increasing number of Africans hope and attempt to leave Africa in search of better economic opportunities abroad, the consequences of illegal immigration have negative effects on race relations in developed nations and strain the capacities of governments and law enforcement units.
Providing a program that paves the path toward immigration in a constructive manner, and allows African immigrants to enter America and European nations at higher levels of income-earning potential and social status will help to reduce the burdens caused by illegal immigration.
4. Problems of under-development and public health in African nations threaten to become more, not less, severe in coming years and decades.
Creating a sizable pool of skilled workers who can send money home while abroad on temporary work programs, and then return home with vital professional skills that they can apply toward the development of their home countries, will help to attack the problems of under-development from two critical angles.
CONCLUSION
If people abroad are willing to do almost anything to work in America and Europe, why refuse them? Rather, let's train them and put them to work where we need them most. And then let's send them back, armed with the experience, the tools, and the money they need to address the root cause of immigration - poverty and low standards of living - and continue to build our global community in a spirit of cooperation and good will.













Very interesting proposal. Clearly, there needs to be more between the 1st world and Africa than just money and food aid. I think letter these people into our country is a huge gesture of goodwill and would do a lot for people on either side of the equation. How would the recruiting in Africa work? How would promising young Africans be identified?
I guess identification would have to start at a basic level. I'm not sure, but I've heard of and seen documentary's of less than stellar schools in S. Africa.
The choices for qualification might not be possible unless they are givin fair and adequate opportunity and some kind of format to show potential. Probably end up bringing them up here at a young age. I imagine you would have to have at least a decent high school education to get started in health care such as nurses and doctors. Does that make any sense ?
Makes a lot of sense to me. I like this proposal a lot, but of course, the devil is always in the details.
Yea ,
Some shithead will turn it around as being something it's not. And then there needs to be facilities in S. Africa being built at the same time staff is being trained.
Actually at this point the only problem I could see would be the fighting over the tab. And the locals need more education in prevention , otherwise the whole thing won't work as efficiantly as it could.
I think the host countries would pick up the tab as a form of aid and also as the cost of getting healthcare workers for the 1st world. Preventative medicine..there's a great idea. And not just for Africa either. America has a pretty bad record in preventative medicine as well.
I'm not trying to be negative or problamatic , I just think all potential hurdles should be imagined and approached before launching an effort.Insurance Co.s HMOs . There's also a shitload of people who will say that America should come first and bla bla bla.
Do all the research , so you can deal with objections before they actually get voiced. It would be nice to see this effort take off without a bunch of partisan crap in front of it.
Maybe an example of how the program would work would work could draw govt. grants or funding.On line solicitations,or some kind of sponsorship would be used to fund the first few applicants that qualify as students.After showing a model example , I believe it would be alot easier to get the govt.s to expidite funding and streamline the whole process.
Because it's gonna take a whole lot of doctor's and nurse's to do it right , and the private sector and corporations may not want to foot the whole bill , but could get the ball rolling.
And anyone starts using it to promote his image has to be exposed,immediatly.
A true philanthropist will just do it and shut up.
I'm liking this discussion. Hey Ish, what would you recommend in terms of actually getting this program started? Who might the right people be to talk to?
I don't mean to underestimate anyone by saying this but , make your own cause and give it a title before someone else lays claim to the idea and totally screws it up and it ends up in the hands of someone that needs a ratings boost or needs to sell more movies or CDs
Know what mean ?
Need to find out if a similar effort has been thought of before or attempted.And if so what happened ?
"Doctors without borders" ?
Doctors without borders is an interesting example, but it goes the other way. Doctors from the 1st world go to the 3rd world to help in exchange for student loan assistance. Similar kind of idea though. I'm afraid with this example it would be quite hard for a Non-governmental organization to accomplish. With the immigration waivers necessary it would really have to be a government program, run jointly between the 1st world government and the 3rd world government.
yea , I meant to research through DWBs to see what hurdles to expect , they could probably have alot of good info , want to see what ish has to say.
First, I don't take credit for this as a completely original idea. In a quick web search, I found for example that Bristol Meyers Squibb has a little program in South Africa that trains healthcare workers - not necessarily to bring them to the developed world, but still similar.
I didn't want to bog down the article with too many specifics, and I'm not an expert but here goes:
1. Funding and administration - we already give millions of dollars in aid to Africa. Let's find out where the waste and the corruption is, shave $10 million out of whatever's being spent on bull$%*!, and use it for some pilot programs. Have major and trusted aid agencies directly affiliated with governments, like USAID, administer the program in partnership with trusted local NGOs.
2. Location - start the pilot programs in South Africa (because its healthcare facilities are already first world quality in some places), in Senegal (for French speakers, and because it's the capital of West Africa for many things), and Kenya because it's an important East African regional leader. Ghana and Nigeria would be good contenders for pilot programs too. If we expand into North Africa, Egypt, Morocco, and Tunisia would be all be good choices. 100 people in each location each year for three years (enough to graduate 2 classes from a 2-year program), then expand to 500 or 1000.
3. Recruitment - there are many ways to do it. One idea, have doctors and nurses come up with an aptitude test and let anyone under 35 with a high school degree take it, then take those who score highest. Another idea, recruit out of science departments in universities based on grades and faculty recommendations. No matter what I favor personal interviews to judge who's really committed. The time and personnel to do interviews would increase operating costs but I believe it's worth it to get the best candidates. Me, I'm also not opposed to a little affirmative action to make sure you're getting at least some candidates who are in genuine economic need, and at least 50% women.
4. The contracts - all recruits get 10-year, multiple-entry visas to their countries of destination, and a small grant to help with initial setup costs. They will be assigned a mentor at their workplace. While they will be encouraged to send a large portion of their income home (say 20%), they will not be required to do so. After 10 years they will be sent home with another small grant to assist them in establishing businesses or organizations at home. The best alumni will be recruited to teach for their program in their host countries.
5. Actually doing it - let me do a little research and get back to y'all on that soon.
damn
Very impressive ish.
I'm concerned that when you attach the affirmative action clause , right away you might get cries of favortism or feminism no matter how good your intentions are.
I personally have no problem selecting a full spectrum of candidates and it would actually add to the positive content.
I dont know , maybe nobody will say anything ,that would be nice.
Maybe using the term " equal opportunity " would be better.
A lot of the money being wasted more than likely is a result of corrupt govt. Or whoever touchs the money first,I'm pretty sure this is fact, so it might be a conflict of interest to put the culprits on the spot.
My own opinion is that this needs to be done on a good size scale and still kept silent or reasonably low key. I imagine doing both at the same time makes it hard.
But no matter what , the more I think about this , the more it makes sense.
I pray it doesn't become political , or a stomping ground for pundit's and media.
Aloha
How do you even start to investigate the money trail ?
And find out who's pissing away the money ?
Be ready to ruffle some feathers.
This idea has to be met with positive enthusiasm by the people we present it to.
If we start going after corrupt officials in order to send that money in a better direction it could get ugly.
I have lot's of thoughts on this effort but I dont want carry this any further than what needs to be done to get started. So I'll kick back ,and if someone thinks of some way I can be of assistance , you know where I'm at
Hmm…I think the key to this would be to try and keep the money out of it, or at least until the Africans get to the 1st world to receive their training, so the paper trail can be more closely monitored. It would be interesting to think about who to talk to with this idea. Presidential candidates? Large non-profits like the Bill & Melinda Gates foundation?
Does anyone thimk that approaching Bristol Meyers would be a good idea ? Approach them in terms of what happened or is happening with their version of such a program.Should we offer to embelish or enlarge and extend what they have going on ? Or ask them for feedback and possible leads to help us get started ?
Maybe they could give us an idea what the playing feild looks like ?
I'll start poking around , but I want feedback first so I don't do anything stupid.
I just read #17
Sounds good ,but we some money to get started , to get the Africans to wherever they need to go.
I guess at this point some kind of presentation needs to be drawn up so we can start selling this idea to some sort of potential sponsor.
But you're right ' once the money lands outside of the U.S. or Europe , tracking it would become a project in itself.
So for now should we start knocking on the doors mentioned ?
Bristol Meyers is an interesting idea. I want to see what Ish digs up first though, before we start knocking on doors as you say.
good deal, talk to ya later
The connection between hollywood and celebrities who all seem to adopt a charity of their choice leaves a bad taste in my mouth because I feel most of them do it from a P.R. standpoint.
But one guy I've watched whom I think is humble and real is Bono.
I wonder if contacting him for support or advice would be a good idea.I beleive he is very knowledgable in the politics in that part of the world and the buisness end of it.I've seen him promote his cause many times on diffrent venues ,he seems very sincere. As a matter of fact he seems very practical about the whole thing.
Just a thought.
This is my favorite page.
On this subject I actually feel like I might be able to make a difference in the world.
America has alot of checks and balances to deal with its problems at home.
But S. Africa is screwed if more people don't step up to the plate. Shit , I'll bet they need plates too.
With food.
like the proposal, but what if once they are trained they don%u2019t want to go back, kind of like when kids get immigration visa to come here and study in college, and they don%u2019t go back afterwards, they stay in America as illegal immigrants, becuase they want to make good money or for whatever other reason