TITLE FIGHT:
iced decaf triple grande five pump soy no whip Mocha vs. black coffee from McDonald's
To many, especially those of us who live on either coast, rural America consists of the states that you fly over on your way from LA to New York or vice versa. People on the coasts regard rural American folk as ignorant, whereas the latter adamantly believe that ‘coasties’ are arrogant and out of touch. Since I’ve lived in both places, I believe I can say that both of these statements aren’t just true for each group, they’re actually true statements in general. People on the coasts, politically speaking, are completely out of touch. They have no idea what goes on in the land where corn comes from. They don’t know how these people speak and behave, and they rely solely on media constructions of the “values vote†to inform their thinking on rural people. Rural Americans, who also focus through the media, find big-city livin to be something alien to them… I mean, who the fuck pays $1,000 in rent for a studio apartment anyway?
I used to think that the “liberal†lifestyle was kind of a myth and more of a Republican red-meat for the masses statement. Then I moved to Seattle and traveled more extensively on the West coast. First off, when I told people I worked in politics I got a completely different reaction than I got when I lived in the Midwest. The first response was a hesitant, “What party do you work for?†When I replied that I worked for the Democratic Party there was first a sigh of relief and then a 15 minute explanation of everything that I and the Party was doing wrong…basically someone reciting what they read in the online version of the New York Times. Seattle, for all its political knowledge, is an entire city of people who think alike but adamantly refuse to admit it…people here like to think that their opinion is unique. It’s not unique, Maureen Dowd has already said it, but it took her longer to get to the point. This homogeneity of opinion is different from rural America.
States like Ohio, (and hell, even Indiana, Michigan, Pennsylvania, basically all states with a decent Big City/Small Town mix) are more diverse than places such as LA, San Fran, New York, Chicago, Boston, and Seattle. First off, these states are more diverse, politically speaking, because in order to win these states in an election (a statewide election) you have to win more than certain cities. Ohio, for all its flaws in 2004, proved that if you win 4 of the top 5 cities and lose the rural vote then you lose the state, and ultimately the election. Same goes for Michigan, PA, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky etc etc etc.
Rural Americans are a lot more political than people think, but their politics are far more reserved. They have better things to do than protest about anything (therefore, they know that the people who are protesting are nut jobs). However, if you sit them down (which I’ve done in focus groups), the political animal within the 55-year-old farmer/police dispatch man comes out of the woodwork. I find the rural American voter to be, honestly, less informed than the coastie voter, but this is a good thing. There’s often too much information out there, and people on the coasts, I feel, are often over-informed. Anyone can watch the news, or read the news, and get the answers that they want. I think people that casually read headlines, or even the local paper on occasion, might be as informed as someone who avidly reads and watches the news every night. Sure, they may not be able to write a dissertation on a given topic, but you get the gist.
However, the rural American voter is complex. Here’s a list of common responses I’ve gotten from these marvels of the political community: