 |
The Anatomy of a Fox Interview |
 |
In what will perhaps become Chris Wallace’s proudest moment, today’s interview of Barack Obama offers a glimpse into the subtle efforts Fox makes to frame the debate.
In the first 9 minutes all of Wallace’s questions and comments were about race.
9:03 A.M EST: WALLACE: But some observers, and some liberal observers say is that part of your problem is you come off as a former law professor who talks about transforming politics when the lunch bucket crowd really wants to know what youre going to do for them. Bob Herbert, columnist for the New York Times, happens to be a black man, says that Hillary Clinton seems tougher than you do.
9:06:32 Senator, for all your efforts to run a post-racial campaign, isn’t there still a racial divide in this country that is going to make it very hard for you to get elected president?
Which created a perfect transition into… the real issue at hand.
9:09 WALLACE: I wasn’t sure whether I was even going to ask you about your former pastor, Jeremiah Wright, but he made it easy for me because he’s now begun this…
Which continued through 6 questions and 6 minutes, to lead into this.
WALLACE: Senator, you say a lot of good stuff. Reverend Wright (INAUDIBLE) are distractions from the real issues. But especially for someone like you, whos a newcomer to the national scene, people dont know a lot about, dont voters have a legitimate interest in who you are and what your values are?
Obama swung back at this one fairly hard, forcing Wallace to pivot his line of questioning to William Ayres, which continued for the final three minutes before the first television break.
20 minutes in, no questions related to policy.
First question after the break:
Over the years, John McCain has broken with his party and risked his career on a number of issues, campaign finance, immigration reform, banning torture. As a president, can you name a hot button issue where you would be willing to cross (ph) Democratic party line and say you know what, Republicans have a better idea here.
Shorter Chris Wallace: John McCain is a maverick, are you? You want Republican votes? Prove it.
Everyone on the Internet seems to have gotten the message that John McCain is not a maverick anymore. As Arianna said on Real Time last week, he has been reduced to a “pandering pawn” of the “agents of intolerance” he once repudiated.
Obama was then allowed two minutes to talk policy, in order to talk about situations where Republicans have better ideas than Democrats. Having his victim exactly where he wants him, Wallace completes the trap.
9:24:46 WALLACE: But, Senator, if I may, I think one of the concerns that some people have is that you talk a good game about, let’s be post-partisan, let’s all come together — just a couple of quick things, and I don’t really want you to defend each one, I just want to speak to the larger issue.
The larger issue, excellent!
On some issues where Democrats have moved to the center, partial-birth abortion, Defense of Marriage Act, you stay on the left and you are against both.
9:25:22 And so people say, do you really want a partnership with Republicans or do you really want unconditional surrender from them?
Shorter Chris Wallace: If you really wanted to be post partisan, you’d chip away at a woman’s right to choose and discriminate against homosexuals.
Obama was then given another two minutes to bend over backwards to appeal to conservative voters.
With all of the fluff out of the way, Chris Wallace has one more thing to get off his chest. Opposition research.
9:28 WALLACE: I want to ask you about more area during this segment. Tax and spending, the Republicans are keeping a running total of all of your plans. They say it’s $662 billion over four years.
And onto the question.
Question, John McCain is going to go after you as another classic liberal tax and spender.
That is a Republican talking point, not a question. Obama was then given about three minutes (almost) uninterrupted to talk about taxes and the economy (#1 issue for voters) before the final commercial break.
Wallace sets the next trap:
9:35 WALLACE: Senator, this week President Bush named David Petraeus, the commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, to be the head of Central Command, which controls overseas military operations across the Middle East and Central Asia. Will you vote to confirm his nomination?
If he says no, he hates America (Go Wallace!). If he says yes…
9:36 WALLACE: Petraeus, I dont have to tell you, is the architect of the troop surge, a strong advocate of our continued engagement in Iraq. If you become commander-in-chief and he says your plan to get out of Iraq is a mistake, will you replace him?
But Petraeus wants war forever, and you don’t. Gotcha!
One more follow up on Petraeus, where Obama sneaks in one minute about Iraq (#3 issue for voters)
That’s enough substance for now (a total of 5 minutes). It’s time for the lightning round!
Lets clear out this campaign business. Why are you ducking another debate with Hillary Clinton?
Clinton talking point.
9:38:48 WALLACE: You say its premature to discuss running mates. Are you at least open to the possibility of running with Hillary Clinton with places on the ticket to be determined?
You answered your own unoriginal question right before you asked it.
9:39 WALLACE: If the voting ends in June and youre still leading in the popular votes and delegates and the superdelegates hand the nomination to Hillary Clinton, do you think the young people, the African American people, the young first time voters you brought into this campaign, arent they going to be awful angry?
Translation: Any chance the primary process will tear the Democratic party apart?
Wallace spends the next 90 seconds trying to determine what it would take for Obama to give up his massive fundraising advantage against John McCain. Obama raised more in March than McCain did in the first quarter.
Wallace, apparently out of ammo, goes fishing with his final question.
9:41:13 WALLACE: Finally, and we have about a minute left, what have you learned in this campaign? And I dont mean, gee, what a great country this is answer.
What mistakes have you made?
Here is the breakdown of the questions, with issue rating determined via Yahoo and AP
Jeremiah Wright: 8 questions
Race: 6 questions
Reaching Across the Aisle to Republicans: 3 questions
The Economy (#1 issue for voters): 2 questions
Gas Prices (#2 issue for voters): 0 questions
Health Care(#3 issue for voters): 0 questions
Iraq (#4 issue for voters): 0 direct questions, 3 through the lens of Petraeus
Here is the amount of time devoted to various topics
Total interview time minus commercials? 37 minutes.
Time devoted to commercials? Over 6 minutes.
Time devoted to the four most important issues for voters? 5 minutes.
Time devoted to Jeremiah Wright? 9 minutes.
The Foxnews.com homepage currently lists the transcript of the interview as a subheading under a story about Rev. Wright. Because let’s be honest, we all know what the real story is here.
The media won’t let Obama win. It’s going to get far worse before it gets better.
You know, I would have disagreed with you a few months ago. Now I’m definitely starting to share your perspective…
Do you have a link to the intereview? Why are you not putting Obama’s replies down?
Here’s a transcript.
“With all of the fluff out of the way, Chris Matthews has one more thing to get off his chest. Opposition research.” — Don’t you mean Chris Wallace, not Chris Matthews from MSNBC?
Must’ve been a Freudian slip, thanks. Corrected.
looking forward to Chris Wallace spending the same amount of time grilling John McCain about the Revs. Parsley and Hagee
Zomg, a talking head is skewing an interview? And someone posted it on teh internets? Stop the presses! Fox is the devil! Dan Rather is awesome! Captain Planet is the best thing Ted Turner ever made!
It happens on both sides of the aisle. If you’re intelligent, you just move on and do your research. If you’re not, you listen to hacked up bits and pieces of interviews found on the internet.
Bad Stumble button, bad.
Finally, all of the Obama supporters are finally waking up to the tricks that FOX play, the same tricks and propaganda that they used against Ron Paul and his message that eventually led to his deletion from the headlines. Here is one of the most prominent lines that came out of Wallace’s mouth in the New Hampshire debate back in September:
WALLACE: “Congressman Paul, … you’re basically saying that we should take our marching orders from Al Qaida? If they want us off the Arabian Peninsula, we should leave?”
PAUL: No.
(APPLAUSE)
PAUL: I’m saying we should take our marching orders from our Constitution. We should not go to war…
(APPLAUSE)
PAUL: We should not go to war without a declaration. We should not go to war when it’s an aggressive war. This is an aggressive invasion. We’ve committed the invasion of this war. And it’s illegal under international law. That’s where I take my marching orders, not from any enemy.
I’m now disappointed that FOX has now continued its efforts to sway the votes with dirty tricks and propaganda aimed toward Obama and the Democratic party.