 |
Bush Co-opts Lebanese Suffering to Advance Iran War Plan |
 |
There really is no limit to how low this pompous little shit will go to satisfy his fragile ego and retarded worldview. Speaking to the BBC in advance of a trip to Middle East, George W. Bush used the recent civil strife in Lebanon to again push his latest crusade (and I do not use that word lightly):
[Bush] said the US was helping the Lebanese army become effective enough to act against Hezbollah's armed wing.
"I don't see how you can have a society with Hezbollah armed up the way they are.
"In this case though, they moved against the Lebanese people, they're not moving against any foreign country, they're moving against the Lebanese people and it should send a signal to everybody that they're a destabilising force."
"The first step of course is to make sure that the Siniora government has got the capacity to respond with a military that's effective," he said.
Hezbollah would be nothing without Iranian backing, he said, adding that Iran was the source of much instability in the Middle East.
First, if the US is helping the Lebanese army the way we’re helping the Iraqi army, or the Pakistani army (or, frankly, our own army), then good luck to them—they’ll need it.
Second, how dare he—Bush—piggyback his bloodlust on the suffering of the Lebanese—suffering he helped bring about.
Don’t forget, it was Bush who was among the loudest advocates for the exit of Syrian forces from Lebanon three years ago. Though, of course, the administration had no plans for how to fill the power vacuum left by the departure of Syria.
And don’t forget that is was Israel’s failed invasion of Lebanon/war on Hezbollah—a fiasco backed by the Bush administration as practice for a broader push against Iran—that substantially strengthened the hand of Hezbollah.
(And don’t get me started on the fact that if it weren’t for Bush’s refusal to deal with the previous Iranian President, Mohammad Khatami, Iran wouldn’t have elected Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in the first place.)
I’m not saying that the Lebanese people themselves didn’t play a large role in the departure of Syrian troops—as did the international community—and I’m not saying that Syrian occupation didn’t need to end. And, I will not deny that Hezbollah receives some support from Iran. But by using the Lebanese situation—the loss of life, the threat of greater instability and violence—to advance his naked political agenda, Bush treats the Lebanese people with the same callous disregard he has shown most of the world’s peoples—they are but pawns in the service of his greater aggrandizement.
I feel pretty certain that the Bush bunch has no real plan for improving stability in Lebanon, and I feel pretty certain that GW himself doesn’t much care. If the dead of Beirut can get the US president closer to raining a few-thousand pounds of explosives on the latest in a list of perceived threats to his already rock-bottom self-esteem—and to his friends’ already sky-high profits—well, god bless ‘em.
And we’re not supposed to talk about why “they” might hate us. . . .
- - - - -
(cross-posted on capitoilette)
Actually, Bush is dead on for once. His statements are in line with what a lot of people have been saying for a while. Iran and Syria are destabilizing Lebanon through Hizbollah. This is an attempt by Hiz. to seize more power against a democratically elected gov't that is currently trapped in a deadlock. And Iran and Syria are more than happy to help.
Think about it for a moment. Would any sovereign, democratic or otherwise, government function with an armed militia inside it's borders taking orders from another nation? Who also provokes its neighbour (Israel) into attacking the country? And operating secret cameras at the airport to track politicians movements…
I agree with Bush on this one. Don't dismiss his words so quickly. For once he spoke reasonably and dare i say, intelligently?
"I agree with Bush on this one. "
Because you're an imperialist tool. Israel and the United States have had their sites on installing a puppet regime in Lebanon from the days of David Ben-Gurion, and Hezbollah is the only thing stopping them from doing so. Hezbollah is extremely popular in Lebanon, even among non-Shiites; recall during the 2006 Israeli attempt to invade Lebanon, how the Lebanese military was virtually useless against the Israelis, while Hezbollah was fighting them on every front and preventing their army from reaching Beirut? Lebanese people remember that, and appreciate it. Without Hezbollah, Lebanon is defenseless against Israeli aggression, which is exactly why Israel and the USA are so keen to dismantle the resistance group.
Who cares if Hezbollah is a state or non-state actor? At this point, it's providing a necessary function by protecting Lebanese people from Israel.
Sometimes a spade really is just a spade:
Hizbollah is tearing up Lebanese neighborhoods. Lebanese army goes in to protect the neighborhoods and push Hizbollah out. They say to Bush, "Hey. We need more gear to chase the bad guys out." Bush says, "Ok. Here ya go."
It really is that simple. You're reading waaaaaaaaaaaaaay too much into it.