Chuck Freeman

Jesus Out, Christ and Warren In for Inaugural Invocation

by Chuck Freeman  ::  Filed Under Religion and Politics  ::  December 20th, 2008 @ 12:08 am EST

Here is the shorthand.  Pastor Rick Warren is doing the opening prayer at the inauguration because he is highly successful in his field, and very influential with a highly reliable voting block.  His “inconvenient truths” around progressive moral issues can be overlooked for these reasons.  The fact that his vocation is religion is incidental.

If Jesus were here today he would not be invited to pray at this historic public event since only a few poor, infirm, hated IRS agents, small town politicians and prostitutes would know him.  Christ would get the nod along with Warren.  Why am I making such a huge distinction between Jesus and Christ?  Because they are two different people.

In Evangelical Christianity there is a very compelling pietistic view of Jesus that goes like this.

“Here is a man who was born in an obscure village, the child of a peasant woman. He grew up in another village. He worked in a carpenter shop until He was thirty and then for three years was an itinerant preacher. He never owned a home. He never wrote a book. He never held an office. He never had a family. He never went to college. He never put his foot inside a big city. He never traveled more than two hundred miles from the place where He was born. He never did one of those things that usually accompany greatness. He had no credentials but himself. 

“While still a young man, the tide of popular opinion turned against him. His friends ran away. One of them denied Him. He was turned over to His enemies. He went through the mockery of a trial. He was nailed on a cross between two thieves. While he was dying his executors gambled for the only piece of property he had on earth - His coat. When he was dead, He was taken down and laid in a borrowed grave through the pity of a friend. 

“Nineteen long centuries have come and gone and today He is the centerpiece of the human race and the leader of the column of progress. I am far within the mark when I say that all the armies that ever marched, all the navies that ever were built, all the parliaments that ever sat, and all the kings that ever reigned, put together, have not affected the life of man upon this earth as powerfully as has that one solitary life.”   

The only problem with this perspective is that it doesn’t match the evidence.  The odds are low that we would have never heard of Jesus had he not morphed into Christ, becoming the standard bearer for the Roman Empire.

Michael White, Professor of Classics and Director of the Religious Studies Program with the University of Texas at Austin writes

The transformation of Christianity over the first 300 years of its existence is really a profound one. What started out as a Messianic claimant or a political rebel, a victim of the Pax Romana, by the time of the conversion of Constantine becomes the official religion of the Roman Empire.  What is originally a movement oppressed by Caesar because it’s a competitor, eventually becomes a cult of the Lord Christ, by the time we get to the late first and early second century. With the conversion of Constantine, however, it becomes an imperial religion.  Now, Jesus had been transformed into the Lord Christ of Heaven and Constantine, the emperor, ruled in his name.

Shaye I.D. Cohen, Samuel Ungerleider Professor of Judaic Studies and Professor of Religious Studies Brown University crystalizes this reality with a telling and chilling illustration.

There’s a beautiful mosaic in Ravenna, a city in northern Italy, which I routinely show my classes. It’s of a beautiful, very handsome, well muscled, beardless man. He’s dressed in a Roman officer’s uniform. He’s stepping on the head of a lion, and he’s holding a standard. The standard says in Latin, “I am the way. The truth. And the life.” Usually my students can’t read Latin and I say, “Who’s this a picture of?”  They guess, “The Roman Emperor.” But it’s not. It’s a picture of Jesus.

One of the primary ways a person gets noticed on the grand stage of the American Empire is to breakthrough in the media whether they have accomplished a damn thing or not.  Need I say more than “Joe the Plumber?”  He is “writing” a book, which I am chagrined to admit is being published in my hometown of Austin, Texas.  If you hear reports of Barbara Jordan’s ghost haunting us, you will know why.

Obama is not Bush and Warren is not Brownie.  Rick Warren has accomplished much and serves many hurting people with seemingly humility.  Obama is drawn to people like Warren.  When he was writing his book, “The Audacity of Hope” he asked Warren to review his chapter on religion.  The dialogue forged a friendship between the two based on common ground while not denying their disagreements. 

Pastor Warren’s book “The Purpose Driven Life” has sold 40 million copies, six times as many as Obama’s three books combined. He has called attention to hunger and illiteracy and is credited with expanding the evangelical agenda beyond such issues as abortion and gay rights, even though he sticks to his Southern Baptist roots in opposing them.

Warren is often called “America’s most influential spiritual leader.” He founded Saddleback Church in Orange County, California, which is now one of the largest and best-known churches in the world.  Calling him a “spiritual entrepreneur,” Forbes magazine said, “If Warren’s ministry was a business it would be compared with Dell, Google, or Starbucks in impact.” Rick and Kay Warren give away 90 percent of the profits from their books to charitable causes, including their global P.E.A.C.E. plan and Acts of Mercy, which services those infected with and affected by AIDS. 

Christ and Warren are alike in that they have risen to world wide prominence; Christ through the State, Warren via media.  Consequently, they are embraced by those who have something to gain from them.  Obama has benefitted from both Christ and Pastor Warren.  He often invokes Christian themes, language and imagery - America’s state religion.  His association with Warren grants him enough familiarity with the Evangelical sub culture to buy some support.

Like other progressives I object to Warren being given this platform for the same reasons that are reverberating around the net.  But, I do get why Obama not only chose him for the invocation but will continue to cultivate a connection with the Pastor.

In defending his choices Obama emphasized that Joseph Lowery, a founder of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, will give the benediction and has “deeply contrasting views to Warren on a whole host of issues.” 

When is the last time a liberal religious Minister produced any body of work that resonated with 40 million people worldwide in more than 50 languages? How many progressive Ministers preach to churches a tenth the size of Saddleback’s 20,000?  Has a liberal Minister EVER hosted a forum for the presidential candidates?

We can bitch and protest about Pastor Warren’s tribal moral stances, and make a righteous case about why he shouldn’t have been given this Inaugural honor.  But, If liberal Ministers want to move up in the the prayer giving pecking order, these are good questions to begin asking ourselves.

The Seminal News Feed

FACTBOX-Countries slap bans on pork after flu outbreak
Monday, 4 May 2009, 7:35 pm

Albanian immigrants get life in plot to hit US base
Tuesday, 28 April 2009, 9:26 pm

Six tonne drug blaze a small step in Afghan battles
Sunday, 26 April 2009, 11:50 am

DISCUSSION

7 RESPONSES to “Jesus Out, Christ and Warren In for Inaugural Invocation”

Jim Moss says  ::  December 20th, 2008 @ 8:49 am EST

I think you are spot on with your analysis of Warren and why Obama chose him for the invocation - but I disagree with your implicit assumption that liberal ministers should want to “move up in the pecking order” so we can be given high-profile gigs such as this.

One of my all-time heroes is the prophet Amos, who was one of the greatest prophets in the history of Israel. But Amos was not a priest (he was a herdsman and a dresser of sycamore trees), he was completely unknown in his time, and he was most likely arrested and jailed or executed for speaking out against the powers that be in the public square.

Religious who follow the path of Warren to fame and stardom are following the path that the devil tried to take Jesus down when he was tempted in the wilderness in Luke 4. So let’s not make Warren some type of role model.

Chuck Freeman says  ::  December 20th, 2008 @ 11:20 am EST

Thanks for you perspective Jim. I too love Amos and other erstwhile prophets. I’m beginning to question the romantic spiritual notion that the unknown “meek and lowly” have much impact in the public square. Neither of us would have heard of Amos had he not been in the “media” of his day, the sacred Hebrew scriptures. MLK had trouble gaining national traction until the media began to follow the movement.

I do also believe in the little bit of leaven, “leavening the whole lump.” I do think it is a both/ and.
I say we liberal ministers are well served to ask the questions I posed at the end of the piece. Warren’s “fame and stardom” followed his impacting the lives of 40 million plus. This is nothing to brush off with a phrase. It could be a devil temptation or it could be the fruit of meeting peoples deep spiritual longings.

Soulfully,

Chuck

David E. Holt says  ::  December 21st, 2008 @ 10:01 am EST

My question: who WOULD you have asked to pray at Obama’s inaugural? Someone with whom you completely and wholly agree? I doubt any of us could find such a person. Must we all agree with one another to be valued? Does someone elses opinion counter or erase ours? Must someone else determine the validity of our thoughts, pronouncements or beliefs? We are all precious in God’s heart - hopefully, He is precious in ours. I understand their divisions created by issues with which we disagree. But do those issues have to polarize us to the point of hatred? As a minister I don’t agree with the ideas and beliefs of many Christians whom I’ve met. I do, however, give them the right to be wrong! :) Let Rick pray, he obviously has a relationship with God. I don’t think he’ll talk about issues, do you?
David E. Holt http://www.strategicbookpublishing.com/ABCsOfMinistry.html

    Jim Moss says  ::  December 21st, 2008 @ 1:44 pm EST

    Better question: Why does there have to be a prayer at the inaugural? Let’s get serious about this separation of church and state.

chuck freeman says  ::  December 21st, 2008 @ 5:11 pm EST

David,
I would have chosen someone like Bishop Spong. The major point of my piece is that if liberal ministers want to have more high profile gigs like public prayers then we have to do things that distinguish ourselves like Pastor Warren has, rather than bitching about who is being chosen. Even though I have fundamental disagreements with Warren’s beliefs I do respect his good works. The litmus test is not agreeing on everything, but there are some core beliefs. Equal rights is one of them.
Blessings in your ministry!

Soulfully,

Chuck

chuck freeman says  ::  December 21st, 2008 @ 5:18 pm EST

Jim,
I used to get irritated as a Chaplain when people wanted to pigeon hole me as someone who could only do stained glass things like pray. If all the Minister does is put on a holy show and then is not listened to in substantive deliberations that is the worst kind of being patronized. I understand your “separation of church and state” argument, but why not have Ministers as a team of “moral advisors?”

Soulfully,

Chuck

a.m. schmitz says  ::  December 22nd, 2008 @ 3:38 pm EST

well i guess that beltway chuck colson can now be demonized for his prayer breakfasts..thank god..but to bad there aint one..

Comments are closed

Take the Blog Reader Project survey.

UPCOMING ON REDDIT
Please vote!

UPCOMING ON DIGG
Please vote!
I support Health Care for America Now