 |
New York Times Says Reporting on Iran Follows “Publish First, Ask Questions Later” Model–Sort of Like the Model the Times and Others Followed in Reporting on the Build-Up to War in Iraq |
 |
The NY Times has a piece in today’s paper entitled “Journalism Rules Are Bent in News Coverage from Iran.” The piece questions the accuracy of news reporting on recent events in Iran that is based on “anonymous Twitter messages”, blogging and “unverified videos.” The Times piece calls this type of reporting evidence of a “publish first, ask questions later” approach to journalism.
I think it’s absolutely fair for the Times to ask questions about the sources for news coming out of Iran, but I also think they’re incorrectly suggesting that the axiom “check the source” especially applies to reports associated with new media. Let’s not forget the Times’ failure to consider the source when it uncritically published reports by Judith Miller and others that accepted at face value the Bush administration’s misinformation about WMD in Iraq The Times ultimately conceded that its coverage of the buildup to the war in Iraq was “not as rigorous as it should have been.” It admitted that reporting had often depended on “Iraqi informants, defectors and exiles bent on regime change in Iraq” whose credibility “c[a]me under increasing public debate.” That’s putting it mildly.
I think it’s a great idea for the Times and others across the media spectrum to be skeptical, to ask questions, to consider and check the source when it comes to recent events in Iran. I just hope that this scrutiny is not limited only to reporting that involves new media and is not limited to recent events in Iran .
